Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new(libsinsp,libscap): Support full argument retrieval on both entry and exit for some syscalls #235

Merged

Conversation

LucaGuerra
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area build

/area driver-kmod

/area driver-ebpf

/area libscap

/area libsinsp

/area tests

/area proposals

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds support in the Falco libraries to allow the kernel module to retrieve userspace buffers on both entry and exit events for the following syscalls: connect, open, openat, openat2 and creat. Relevant changes are ported to the kernel module, eBPF probe and udig accordingly.

Currently, the Falco libraries read the arguments, especially userspace buffers, for those system calls at exit time, but there is no guarantee that those buffers will still be available and unchanged since the syscall started.

With this patch, when both entry and exit events are retrieved, libsinsp is then able to deal with the potential differences so that fd.name/fd.sip/etc are correct and rules are processed properly even if any modification to userspace memory happened in the meantime.

Performance Evaluation:
Experiments were performed by comparing performance at f05aaec and with this patch. To do so, we ran https://github.com/falcosecurity/event-generator with options ./event-generator bench "syscall.ReadSensitiveFileUntrusted" against Falco with both versions of the Falco libs.

The selected test (syscall.ReadSensitiveFileUntrusted) exercises the open() family of syscalls which is involved in this patch. On our cloud instances, both versions started dropping events between 19000 and 20000 events per second, with no significant difference between the two.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

new(libs): added entry parameters to connect, open, openat..., creat

… and exit for some syscalls

Signed-off-by: Luca Guerra <luca@guerra.sh>
Co-authored-by: Lorenzo Susini <susinilorenzo1@gmail.com>
@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Mar 1, 2022

Hi @LucaGuerra. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a falcosecurity member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@poiana poiana added the size/XXL label Mar 1, 2022
@FedeDP
Copy link
Contributor

FedeDP commented Mar 1, 2022

Hi! Thanks for this huge PR!! 🚀
/ok-to-test

Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Mar 3, 2022

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: b8e4cb4b384a1e4e98dfc9aba448d43d73068b57

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Mar 3, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: FedeDP, LucaGuerra

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana poiana added the approved label Mar 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants